ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
The roles of stress, illness management, and goal setting on the association between personal and clinical recovery - a prospective study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInvestigating underlying working mechanisms involved in the relationship between personal and clinical recovery is important for enhancing mental health treatment. This prospective study investigated the impact of two anticipated moderators, 1) receiving help with managing stress and illness, and 2) receiving help with setting and achieving goals, on the association between personal and clinical recovery at baseline and 18-month follow-up among service users with psychosis.
methodsData were collected from service users with psychosis and their clinicians from 32 clinical sites across Norway at baseline (n = 318) and after 18 months (n = 121). Personal recovery was measured using the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery. Linear mixed models were estimated to assess the impact of the two moderators on the association between personal and clinical recovery.
resultsService users with higher level of symptoms at baseline who stated that they received help with setting and achieving goals showed greater personal recovery over 18 months compared to those who stated that they did not receive this help. Service users with low level of functioning who stated that they received help with managing stress and illness or setting and achieving goals experienced higher levels of personal recovery than did those who stated that they did not receive this help.
conclusionReceiving help with managing stress and illness and receiving help with setting and achieving goals, have an impact on personal recovery for service users with low levels of functioning and/or higher levels of symptoms. It might be beneficial to incorporate these aspects into treatments aimed at increasing personal recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.