ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Challenging the notion of Aedes aegypti as the primary chikungunya virus vector: insights from Kédougou, Southeastern Senegal.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChikungunya fever (CHIK) caused by the mosquito-borne chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and transmitted by Aedes (Ae.) mosquitoes, remains a public health burden throughout the tropics. During the CHIK outbreak in southeastern Senegal in August 2023, an entomologic investigation was conducted to identify the vector(s) and characterize the virus strains.
methodsAdult mosquitoes were collected indoors and outdoors from houses of confirmed CHIK cases and their immediate neighborhoods using Prokopack aspirators and double-net traps and all water containers were inspected for aquatic stages. Mosquito pools were tested for CHIKV by RT-qPCR and positive samples were subjected to whole genome sequencing using Illumina iSeq system.
resultsAnimal watering points, bricks, and tree holes were the most common sites for Ae. aegypti larvae and pupae. While immature Ae. aegypti were found in all affected villages, with Breteau and Container indices exceeding the WHO epidemic thresholds, Ae. furcifer emerged as the most abundant host-seeking species collected in domestic areas. CHIKV was detected in 31 mosquito pools, primarily in Ae. furcifer (22 pools) and only one pool of Ae. aegypti. Other Ae. species accounted for 8 positive pools and Anopheles (An.) gambiae complex, the primary malaria vector, one pool. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed the close relationship between 2023 CHIKV strains circulating in humans and mosquitoes, and those responsible for the 2015 outbreak.
conclusionsOur study highlights the urgent need to include sylvatic mosquitoes in surveillance and control programs that until now have mainly focused on Ae. aegypti. Moreover, the potential role of An. gambiae in the CHIKV transmission in Senegal warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.