ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Coagulation markers as independent predictors of colorectal cancer aggressiveness.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Relationship between preoperative plasma fibrinogen and prognosis in patients with non-metastatic gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical pathological changes in prostate cancer patients after hormonal therapy: A single-center pilot study.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is frequently associated with thrombosis with thrombotic events, such as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, often correlate with poor clinical outcomes. Coagulation markers have been suggested as potential prognostic indicators for CRC severity. However, the relationship with clinicopathological characteristics in CRC remains unclear. PURPOSE: This study aims to examine the relationship between routine coagulation markers and clinicopathological characteristics in CRC patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 patients with confirmed diagnosis of CRC, classified according to the 2018 edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor/Node/Metastasis staging system for malignant tumors. Clinicopathological characteristics and routine coagulation tests including prothrombin time, and international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin activity, thrombin time, fibrinogen, d-dimer, platelet count, were evaluated. Spearman correlation was used to assess correlations with clinicopathological characteristics. Additionally, univariate and multivariate ordinal regression analysis were conducted to detect the independent predictors for CRC aggressiveness.
resultsOur data documents several associations between coagulation markers and cancer progression markers. Specifically, positive correlations were identified between fibrinogen and d-dimer levels and each of the following: carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen, tumor stage, node involvement, and metastasis. Regression analysis showed, d-dimer (OR = 1.102, p < 0.001) and fibrinogen (OR = 1.002, p < 0.001) are independent predictors of high-risk CRC cases.
conclusionFibrinogen and d-dimer may serve as independent predictive biomarkers for CRC aggression. Their clinical utility could support personalized treatment plans for CRC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.