ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Dynamic birth position, awareness and practice by midwives in Ethiopia: a parallel mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRespectful maternity care, as recommended by the World Health Organization, includes allowing women to give birth in the position of their choice. Dynamic birth positions, which enable women to adopt various positions during labor and delivery, are associated with improved obstetric outcomes. However, the extent of knowledge and practice regarding dynamic birth positions among Ethiopian midwives remains poorly understood.
objectiveTo assess midwives' awareness and practice of dynamic birth positions and explore their perspectives and experiences.
methodsA convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed to evaluate midwives' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding dynamic birth positions. Quantitative data were analyzed using stepwise backward elimination logistic regression to identify key predictors, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis.
resultsThe study included 483 midwives, with 473 participating in the quantitative survey and 10 in the qualitative interviews. Fewer than half of the midwives demonstrated good levels of knowledge (45%) and attitude (49.5%), while only 22.6% reported regular practice of dynamic birth positions. Participation in training emerged as the strongest predictor of knowledge, attitude, and practice. Thematic analysis revealed six key themes: routine practices, awareness, clinical implementation, barriers, facilitators, and user needs.
conclusionAwareness and practice of dynamic birth positions among Ethiopian midwives are notably low. Key barriers include limited awareness and suboptimal working conditions, whereas targeted training significantly enhances all assessed domains. To promote the adoption of dynamic birth positions, efforts should focus on increasing awareness, modifying delivery equipment, and improving the clinical environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.