ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Towards the genome-scale discovery of bivariate monotonic classifiers.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of monotonically classifying pairs of genes for ordinal disease outcomes.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBivariate monotonic classifiers (BMCs) are based on pairs of input features. Like many other models used for machine learning, they can capture nonlinear patterns in high-dimensional data. At the same time, they are simple and easy to interpret. Until now, the use of BMCs on a genome scale was hampered by the high computational complexity of the search for pairs of features with a high leave-one-out performance estimate.
resultsWe introduce the fastBMC algorithm, which drastically speeds up the identification of BMCs. The algorithm is based on a mathematical bound for the BMC performance estimate while maintaining optimality. We show empirically that fastBMC speeds up the computation by a factor of at least 15 already for a small number of features, compared to the traditional approach. For two of the three smaller biomedical datasets that we consider here, the resulting possibility of considering much larger sets of features translates into significantly improved classification performance. As an example of the high degree of interpretability of BMCs, we discuss a straightforward interpretation of a BMC glioblastoma survival predictor, an immediate novel biomedical hypothesis, options for biomedical validation, and treatment implications. In addition, we study the performance of fastBMC on a larger and well-known breast cancer dataset, validating the benefits of the BMCs for biomarker identification and biomedical hypothesis generation.
conclusionfastBMC enables the rapid construction of robust and interpretable ensemble models using BMC, facilitating the discovery of gene pairs predictive of relevant phenotypes and their interaction in that context. AVAILABILITY: We provide the first open-source implementation for learning BMCs, a Python implementation of fastBMC in particular, and Python code to reproduce the fastBMC results on real and simulated data in this paper, at https://github.com/oceanefrqt/fastBMC .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.