ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
The impact of tele-education support on mothers' sense of security and breastfeeding self-efficacy during the pandemic.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of Digital Health Interventions on Breastfeeding Rates, Self-Efficacy, and Knowledge: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions to daily life, leading to increased anxiety, stress, and depression, particularly among postpartum women.
methodsThis study is a quasi-experimental design aimed at determining the effect of supportive tele-education on postpartum care offered to women during the COVID-19 period, specifically focusing on the mothers' obsessive-compulsive behaviors, feelings of safety, and breastfeeding self-efficacy. In the study, independent t-tests and dependent t-tests were utilized. Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests were also applied.
resultsWhen comparing the scores of the Obsessive and Compulsive Behavior Scale for infant care, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p > 0.05). The breastfeeding self-efficacy scale scores were evaluated based on the participants' groups, and it was observed that while the scale scores remained the same in the experimental group after the second interview (35-42 days), the control group's scores significantly decreased (p < 0.05).
conclusionThe study concluded that alternatives for ensuring the accessibility of health services to the community under all conditions and circumstances have been demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.