ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Multidimensional predictors of preterm birth risk among black and white primiparous women in the U.S.: insights from machine learning.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning to predict adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnmeasured contextual factors contribute to Black-White disparities in preterm birth (PTB), but their effects are difficult to isolate due to complex relationships with individual factors connected in non-linear ways. To address this, we applied explainable machine learning to model interactions between individual and contextual factors to predict PTB and identify its key predictors among non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) primiparous women in the U.S.
methodsElastic Net, Random Forest, and XGBoost models were developed using Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System and the Social Vulnerability Index data from nine U.S. states. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were computed to assess feature importance. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the ROC curve (AUC).
resultsOur models predicted PTB with high accuracy (AUC: 0.87–0.93) for NHB and NHW primiparous women, identifying both shared and distinct multidimensional predictors. Shared individual predictors included ≥ 9 prenatal care visits (protective; mean |SHAP| 0.42–1.58), adequate + prenatal care (risk-increasing; mean |SHAP| 0.69 for NHB and 1.18 for NHW), and gestational hypertension (risk-increasing; mean |SHAP| 0.17 and 0.20, respectively). Contextual socioeconomic status and household composition also contributed significantly to PTB prediction, with a stronger impact among NHB women.
conclusionsExplainble machine learning with SHAP values can accurately quantify the contribution of individual and contextual factors to PTB risk specific to NHB and NHW primiparous women. By integrating feature importance with the prevalence of risk factors, this approach offers actionable insights to identify priority areas for intervention and inform tailored preventive strategies aimed at reducing Black-White disparities in PTB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.