Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40898050›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2025

Creating a delirium risk assessment model for geriatric patients with femoral neck fractures through artificial intelligence techniques: a theoretical exploration.

Yu Zhu, Ning Zhou, Renrui Liang, Jian-Jun Yang, Cheng-Mao Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu Zhu *Department of Anaesthesiology and Nuring, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Ning Zhou *Department of Emergency, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Renrui LiangDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Nuring, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China. lrr011@126.com.
Jian-Jun YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The first Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. yjyangjj@126.com.
Cheng-Mao ZhouDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Nuring, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China. zhouchengmao187@foxmail.com.

Funding

Guangdong Medical Research Fund B2023054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative delirium (POD) is a common occurrence following orthopedic surgery, particularly in the older population. However, there is a relative scarcity of research on the use of intelligent algorithms to predict POD in older patients after orthopedic surgery. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ten distinct intelligent algorithms in predicting POD in older patients undergoing femoral neck fracture surgery.

methodsThis study selected ten advanced artificial intelligence algorithms to predict the occurrence of postoperative delirium by analyzing patient data.

resultsA total of 1889 patients were included in this study. The dataset for this study was divided into a training dataset, which consisted of synthetic data, and a testing dataset, representing real-world clinical scenarios. In the training dataset, we identified 267 cases of POD, accounting for 26.70% of the group. In the testing dataset, 172 cases of POD were confirmed, representing 19.35% of the group. Analysis using the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) algorithm revealed that age, preoperative hemoglobin levels, duration of anesthesia, and intraoperative blood loss are key predictive factors for POD in older patients with femoral neck fractures. Among the intelligent algorithms tested for predicting POD in the testing group, logistic regression, random forest, and the Multilayer Perceptron Classifier (MLPC) performed best with accuracy rates of 0.810, 0.810, and 0.808, respectively. In terms of precision, MLPC led with a score of 1.000, followed by random forest (0.714) and logistic regression (0.548). The highest recall rates were achieved by Gaussian Naive Bayes (gnb, 0.337) and AdaBoost (adab, 0.198). Gaussian Naive Bayes also performed best in F1 score (0.244). In the evaluation of the Area Under the Curve (AUC), logistic regression, MLPC, and XGBoost (XGB) demonstrated the best performance, with values of 0.669, 0.669, and 0.652, respectively.

conclusionsThe results of this study indicate that the Multilayer Perceptron Classifier (MLPC) algorithm performed the most excellently in predicting POD after femoral neck fracture surgery in older adults, with an accuracy rate reaching 80.8%. These findings suggest that machine learning algorithms, particularly MLPC, have significant potential and practical effectiveness in predicting POD in specific older patient populations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeliriumFemoral Neck FracturesPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestMachine learningMLPCOlderPODPredicting

Identifiers

PMID40898050
PMCPMC12403423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.