Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40898032›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025

Perceptions of workload in emergency care in the Netherlands and how to influence this: a qualitative study.

Ties Eikendal, Naomi Prudon, Rudolf Bertijn Kool, Patrick Jeurissen, Menno Iskander Gaakeer, Bas de Groot, Simone A van Dulmen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ties EikendalDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands. ties.eikendal@radboudumc.nl.
Naomi PrudonIQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Rudolf Bertijn KoolIQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Patrick JeurissenIQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Menno Iskander GaakeerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Admiraal De Ruyter Hospital, Goes, Netherlands.
Bas de GrootDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Simone A van DulmenIQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequate staffing and manageable workloads are crucial for high-quality emergency care. However, high perceived workloads in the emergency department (ED) threaten both. Increased demand and staff shortages intensify these issues and cause crowding. Understanding healthcare workers' perspectives on workload is essential for effective policymaking and maintaining a durable workforce. The objective of this study was to explore the current perceived workload of ED professionals, and their vision on how to influence it and to understand the healthcare worker's perspective on proposed healthcare reforms in the Netherlands.

methodsQualitive study using semi-structured interviews with 33 healthcare professionals (ED physicians, physician assistants and nurses) working in a university medical center, and three general hospitals from March-July 2023. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The interview transcripts were coded. An inductive content analysis was performed, where codes were assigned to the transcripts and adjusted. Codes were then sorted into themes on causes of workload, consequences and proposed solutions for reducing the workload.

resultsEmergency department professionals identified increasing patient inflow, barriers to patient throughput and output, and staff shortages as key workload causes. Consequences included increased time, mental and psychological demands, leading to stress and reduced job satisfaction. A well-coordinated team and having social interaction with colleagues is seen as a key part of the profession by ED-professionals. Next to that, training and development opportunities contribute to job satisfaction. Proposed solutions involved public education, improved care coordination, technological innovations, and enhanced collaboration within and among hospitals to improve efficiency and job satisfaction, and to reduce perceived workload pressure.

conclusionsAddressing perceived workload is crucial for maintaining quality and accessibility of care. Dutch ED professionals face a high workload leading to stress and lower job satisfaction. To ensure successful changes, adequate preconditions and engaging healthcare professionals in decision-making are crucial. In future research, a stronger focus on effective work habits and processes, including provider satisfaction and workplace well-being, is necessary.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEmergency Service, HospitalWorkloadAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsQualitative ResearchAcute careEmergency departmentEmergency department professionalsHealthcare reformsJob satisfactionWorkload

Identifiers

PMID40898032
PMCPMC12403633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.