Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40898018›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

A simplified hybrid capture approach retains high specificity and enables PCR-free workflow.

Adeline Huizhen Mah, Xiaodong Qi, Junhua Zhao, Kelly Wiseman, Laure Edoli, Kyle Metcalfe, Kyle Donohoe, Micah Ojeda, Sophie Billings, Juan Moreno and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Neoplasia in the dromedary camel: a review (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Adeline Huizhen Mah *Element Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Xiaodong Qi *Element Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Junhua Zhao *Element Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kelly WisemanElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Laure EdoliElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kyle MetcalfeElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kyle DonohoeElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Micah OjedaElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sophie BillingsElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Juan MorenoElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Marina McCowinElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Ben KrajacichElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kevin GreenElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Ramkrishna AdhikaryElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Andrew BoddickerElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Joshua ChanElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Peter MainsElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Bryan LajoieElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sean DevittElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Semyon KruglyakElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Shawn LevyElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
Michael PreviteElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA. mprevite@elembio.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHybrid capture is a critical technology for selective enrichment of genomic regions of interest in genomic analysis. Despite its widespread adoption, the core methodology has remained largely unchanged for over 15 years, with traditional workflows involving time-consuming bead-based capture steps, multiple temperature-controlled washes, and post-hybridization PCR. These steps introduce workflow complexity, increase turnaround time, and can negatively impact library complexity and variant calling accuracy.

resultsWe present a simplified hybrid capture workflow that eliminates these complexities by directly loading the hybridization product onto the sequencing flow cell. The approach is enabled by the development of a streptavidin flow cell surface, a method to circularize and amplify captured targets on the flow cell, and a fast hybridization protocol. Our workflow reduces the time from the start of library preparation to the start of sequencing by over 50% while maintaining or improving capture specificity and library complexity. We demonstrate improved variant calling performance with indel false positive and false negative reductions of 89% and 67%, respectively. We also show how the approach can be used to create an entirely PCR-free targeted sequencing workflow.

conclusionsWe present a targeted sequencing workflow that eliminates bead-based capture, multiple washes, and post-hybridization PCR, while improving various aspects of data quality. The performance of the approach was evaluated by sequencing hundreds of samples and demonstrating high on-target rates, reduced duplicates, and improved indel accuracy. By combining the approach with a PCR-free library preparation, we enable an entirely PCR-free targeted sequencing assay which further improves indel calling, and shows the ability to call an HTT expansion, associated with Huntington's disease. This streamlined approach addresses key operational challenges in targeted sequencing, offering potential benefits for applications requiring rapid turnaround times or increased capability in variant detection.

Indexed as

GenomicsNucleic Acid HybridizationWorkflowGene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNAExome sequencingHTT repeat expansion detectionHybrid captureImproved indel callingImproved workflowPCR-freetargeted sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40898018
PMCPMC12403294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.