ArticleBMC genomics2025
A simplified hybrid capture approach retains high specificity and enables PCR-free workflow.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Whole Exome Sequencing Commercial Kits Performance Across Diverse Tissue Sources.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs): Current Etiological Perspectives and Advances in Viral Metagenomics-A Review.Viruses · 2025Review
- Methods, applications, and computational challenges in bait capture enrichment.Cell reports methods · 2025Review
- Neoplasia in the dromedary camel: a review (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHybrid capture is a critical technology for selective enrichment of genomic regions of interest in genomic analysis. Despite its widespread adoption, the core methodology has remained largely unchanged for over 15 years, with traditional workflows involving time-consuming bead-based capture steps, multiple temperature-controlled washes, and post-hybridization PCR. These steps introduce workflow complexity, increase turnaround time, and can negatively impact library complexity and variant calling accuracy.
resultsWe present a simplified hybrid capture workflow that eliminates these complexities by directly loading the hybridization product onto the sequencing flow cell. The approach is enabled by the development of a streptavidin flow cell surface, a method to circularize and amplify captured targets on the flow cell, and a fast hybridization protocol. Our workflow reduces the time from the start of library preparation to the start of sequencing by over 50% while maintaining or improving capture specificity and library complexity. We demonstrate improved variant calling performance with indel false positive and false negative reductions of 89% and 67%, respectively. We also show how the approach can be used to create an entirely PCR-free targeted sequencing workflow.
conclusionsWe present a targeted sequencing workflow that eliminates bead-based capture, multiple washes, and post-hybridization PCR, while improving various aspects of data quality. The performance of the approach was evaluated by sequencing hundreds of samples and demonstrating high on-target rates, reduced duplicates, and improved indel accuracy. By combining the approach with a PCR-free library preparation, we enable an entirely PCR-free targeted sequencing assay which further improves indel calling, and shows the ability to call an HTT expansion, associated with Huntington's disease. This streamlined approach addresses key operational challenges in targeted sequencing, offering potential benefits for applications requiring rapid turnaround times or increased capability in variant detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.