Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897960›Full record

SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Management of High-Riding Nipple-Areola Complex: A Systematic Review of Its Prevention and Management.

Ross Weale, Muhammad Umair Javed

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ross WealePlastic Surgery Resident, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, SA6 6NL, UK. Ross.weale@Wales.nhs.uk.
Muhammad Umair JavedConsultant Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal positioning of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) remains a challenging part of breast surgery, with high-riding NAC (HRNAC) frequently occurring postoperatively. An evidence-based summary of all effective prevention and management strategies is needed for a variety of surgical contexts.

objectivesThis systematic review aims to explore and summarise the prevention and corrective strategies for HRNAC across aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgeries. The review evaluates their evidence base and summarises the techniques available.

methodsA PRISMA compliant search of PubMed/Medline was conducted on November 1st, 2024, and the following search terms were used: "nipple AND high AND riding OR malposition AND breast". Data on demographics, surgical technique, outcomes, and levels of evidence were extracted.

results346 articles were screened, yielding 36 after full text screening. Of these, 23 studies included reconstructive surgeries (20 purely reconstructive and 3 mixed), and 13 aesthetic surgeries. For reconstructive surgeries, corrective surgeries included crescent mastopexy, re-draping mastectomy flaps, transposition flaps of various designs, change of implant plane and free nipple grafting. Prevention strategies included suture placement to secure the NAC and implant using various methods, preoperative marking strategies, and maximal filling of the expander. For aesthetic surgeries, preventative strategies also included precise preoperative markings, in addition to intraoperative stabilisation of the envelope and implant pocket. Corrective measures ranged from crescent mastopexy, change in implant plane, local flaps and tissue expansion, amongst others. Outcomes were inconsistently reported and therefore meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogenicity of data. A new evidence-based algorithm is suggested.

conclusionsThis review highlights the broad range of procedures and prevention strategies for correcting HRNAC, representing the challenging nature of the problem. There is a significant lack of objective and consistent outcome reporting. For the future, standardised reporting including patient-reported outcome measures are required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

MammaplastyNipplesPostoperative ComplicationsEstheticsFemaleHumansMastectomySurgical FlapsAreolaBreast reductionHigh nippleHigh-ridingHRNACMastectomyNipple

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.