ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Deep learning-based morphological analysis of human sperm.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation Framework for Enhancing the Robustness of Automated Sperm Morphology Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sperm head morphology has been identified as a characteristic that can be used to predict a male's semen quality. Here, harnessing the close relationship considering sperm head shape to quality and morphology, we propose a joint learning model for sperm head segmentation and morphological category prediction. In the model, the sperm category prediction and the ellipticity, calculated by using the segmented sperm head profile, are used to synthesize the morphology to which the sperm belongs. In traditional clinical testing, fertility experts analyze sperm morphology by 2D images of sperm samples, which cannot represent the whole character of their quality and morphological category. To overcome the problem that single-angle 2D images cannot accurately identify sperm morphology, we use a deep-learning-based tracking and detection system to dynamically acquire sperm images with multiple frames and angles and then use the multi-frame and multi-angle time-series images of sperm to determine sperm morphology based on the multi-task model proposed in this study. Performing better than 3D sperm reconstruction and traditional computer-assisted sperm assessment systems, this approach enables end-to-end analysis of viable spermatozoa, requiring minimal computing power and utilizing equipment already available in most embryology laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40897949What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.