ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Should percutaneous nephrolithotomy be performed in patients with severe chronic kidney disease? A closer look at renal function outcomes.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevention of ureteral stone migration during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized controlled trial.World journal of urology · 2026Trial
- A Retrospective comparative analysis of postoperative renal function modification following retrograde intrarenal surgery versus minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (≤ 26Ch) using serum creatinine-based metrics.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on renal function in patients with severely impaired renal function remain uncertain. This study evaluates renal function outcomes following PCNL among this population.
methodsPatients with baseline preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 and a documented eGFR after surgery were identified and included in our chronic kidney disease (CKD) ≥ 3b cohort. Study outcomes included deterioration into dialysis, ∆eGFR and the corresponding CKD stage change. For control groups, patients with preoperative CKD grades 3a, 2 and ≤ 1 were matched to the CKD ≥ 3b cohort and outcomes were compared between the groups. KEY
findings29 PCNL patients were included in the CKD ≥ 3b cohort. Median baseline preoperative eGFR was 38 (IQR 31–42) and 83% were classified as CKD 3b. Median renal function follow up was 8 months (IQR 2–13), Dialysis-free survival at 1 year was 87%, and there was no difference between preoperative and postoperative eGFR values (p = 0.97) with a ∆eGFR of 0 (IQR − 6 to 6). The CKD stage remained stable in 18 patients (62%), improved in 6 (21%), and deteriorated in 5 (17%). ∆eGFR and CKD stage changes in the CKD ≥ 3b cohort were comparable to CKD 3a and CKD 2 control groups, and better than CKD 1 control group (p = 0.02).
conclusionIn patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease, intermediate-term renal function after PCNL predominantly improves or remains stable, with low rates of deterioration into dialysis. These findings support a rigorous approach with PCNL for large stones management in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40897936What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.