ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Introducing the Mesh Integration (MINT) Index: a standardised ratio scale for assessing in vivo hernia mesh performance.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extended validation of the mesh integration (MINT) index: a 1-year porcine study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne in 15 people throughout their lifetime will develop an incisional hernia. Poor mesh tissue integration is thought to be responsible for hernia repair failure years after surgery. The aim was to develop a mesh integration index for standardised assessment of in vivo hernia mesh behaviour in the abdominal wall.
methodsThe core properties of the Index were defined by the authors a priori, requiring the Index to be objective, reproducible, independent of animal models, compatible with past and future research and utilises equipment typically available at biomedical research institutes. The structure of the Index was built upon experience obtained in an earlier pilot study, incorporating key measurements and testing methods identified from previous publications. High precision test methods aligning with local and international standards were utilised where possible.
resultsThe proposed Mesh Integration (MINT) Index is a 0-5 ratio scale that numerically represents the integration, fibrosis, adhesion and degradation behaviour of hernia mesh in vivo, using pre-existing standardised assessments. Assessments fell into four broad categories of visual, histological, biomechanical and molecular. Biomarkers were not included due to uncertainty of interpretation. Score calculations and rationale were explained in detail.
conclusionAn objective index was created to assess in vivo hernia mesh behaviour. The index will need validation via studies using explanted mesh tissue complex from living abdominal walls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.