Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897879›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025

Introducing the Mesh Integration (MINT) Index: a standardised ratio scale for assessing in vivo hernia mesh performance.

Edward Young, Alex Karatassas, Jean Wong, Peter J Hewett, Sarah Jesse, Guy J Maddern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edward YoungDiscipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, PO Box 328, Torrensville, South Australia, 5031, Australia. e.young@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5262-5200
Alex KaratassasDiscipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, PO Box 328, Torrensville, South Australia, 5031, Australia.
Jean WongDepartment of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia.
Peter J HewettDiscipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, PO Box 328, Torrensville, South Australia, 5031, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8135-1317
Sarah JesseDepartment of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4907-9317
Guy J MaddernDiscipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, PO Box 328, Torrensville, South Australia, 5031, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2064-181X

Funding

Hospital Research Foundation 2024-S-RETRO-002-QA 25249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne in 15 people throughout their lifetime will develop an incisional hernia. Poor mesh tissue integration is thought to be responsible for hernia repair failure years after surgery. The aim was to develop a mesh integration index for standardised assessment of in vivo hernia mesh behaviour in the abdominal wall.

methodsThe core properties of the Index were defined by the authors a priori, requiring the Index to be objective, reproducible, independent of animal models, compatible with past and future research and utilises equipment typically available at biomedical research institutes. The structure of the Index was built upon experience obtained in an earlier pilot study, incorporating key measurements and testing methods identified from previous publications. High precision test methods aligning with local and international standards were utilised where possible.

resultsThe proposed Mesh Integration (MINT) Index is a 0-5 ratio scale that numerically represents the integration, fibrosis, adhesion and degradation behaviour of hernia mesh in vivo, using pre-existing standardised assessments. Assessments fell into four broad categories of visual, histological, biomechanical and molecular. Biomarkers were not included due to uncertainty of interpretation. Score calculations and rationale were explained in detail.

conclusionAn objective index was created to assess in vivo hernia mesh behaviour. The index will need validation via studies using explanted mesh tissue complex from living abdominal walls.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallHerniorrhaphyIncisional HerniaSurgical MeshAnimalsFibrosisHumansMaterials TestingPilot ProjectsTissue AdhesionsHerniaIndexMeshTissue integration

Identifiers

PMID40897879
PMCPMC12500770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.