ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Intramedullary nailing of the tibia : Tips and tricks in borderline indications].
Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The indications for tibial nailing are increasingly extending into periarticular regions, often under critical and challenging soft tissue conditions. Furthermore, due to the demographic development fractures of compromised osteoporotic bone must increasingly be surgically treated.Suprapatellar and parapatellar approaches have emerged as effective alternatives to the traditional infrapatellar approach, which simplify the operative technique of reduction and nail insertion, reduce the duration of intraoperative fluoroscopy time and yield improved reduction outcomes particularly in complex periarticular fractures.The insertion of the intramedullary locking nail into the medullary canal does not automatically guarantee an adequate reduction outcome. This article outlines key operative tips and tricks aimed at supporting the orthopedic surgeon in obtaining reproducible optimal surgical outcomes especially in borderline indications.Technological advancements in nail design and fixation methods enable more reliable and precise reduction even in complex cases, especially with fractures involving short metaphyseal fracture fragments. This article also addresses the specific requirements for achieving stable intramedullary fixation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40897869What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.