ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
A phenome-wide association and Mendelian randomization study for suicide attempt within UK Biobank.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-organ imaging genetics: towards an integrated view of brain, body and brain diseases.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- The prospect of suicide biomarkers: from neurobiology to precision prevention.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uncertainties persist in the neurological and behavioral risk factors for suicide attempt (SA) due to a lack of data covering multiple phenotypes. Here, the polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for SA samples within the UK Biobank (N = 40,369) were estimated using non-overlapping Psychiatric Genomics Consortium datasets as a reference. A total of 70 PRS-associated phenotypes encompassing discovered and never-reported phenotypes were identified, thereby facilitating applications in SA identification (area under the curve of 84%). Different with the existing observational studies, the causal effects between brain and SA were explored. Mendelian randomization supported a potential causal effect of right hippocampal gray matter volume on SA, whereas SA had a reverse causal effect on the VI cerebellum. After controlling for the effects of psychiatric disorders, the right hippocampus still had an independent causal effect on SA. These findings provide multi-perspective evidence for early understanding and identification of SA and shed new lights for causal inference between brain and SA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40897861What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.