Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897822›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025

Lipidomic profiling of human bile distinguishes cholangiocarcinoma from benign bile duct diseases with high specificity and sensitivity: a prospective descriptive study.

Fu-Sheng Liu, Ying-Yi Liu, Shi-Kun Zhang, Jun-Yu Zhou, Jing-Hua Li, Xiao-Mian Li, Ming-He Zhang, Xiao-Yu Pan, Yi-Bo Chai, Wei-Xian Fang and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Fu-Sheng Liu *Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1175-5209
Ying-Yi Liu *Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Shi-Kun Zhang *Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jun-Yu ZhouDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jing-Hua LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiao-Mian LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Ming-He ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiao-Yu PanDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yi-Bo ChaiDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Wei-Xian FangDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Tao YuanDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xu-Yun YanDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xi ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Tian-Gen WuDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Wei-Jie MaDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Bo LiaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Ping JiangDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Wei-Hua HuangCollege of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. whhuang@whu.edu.cn.
Song-Mei LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Center for Gene Diagnosis, and Program of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China. smliu@whu.edu.cn.
Shan GuoDepartment of Biological Repositories, Human Genetic Resources Preservation Center of Hubei Province, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China. sguo@whu.edu.cn.
Yu-Feng YuanDepartment of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China. yuanyf1971@whu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3924-3803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare and highly aggressive malignancy originating in the bile ducts. Owing to limitations involving pathological sampling, the clinical differentiation of CCA from benign biliary diseases remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the differences between the bile lipidomes of CCA patients and those of patients with benign disease to develop a bile lipid classifier that can help to differentiate CCA from benign conditions.

methodsBile samples were collected by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) from patients with CCA or benign disease. The participants were divided into three cohorts: the first two cohorts underwent untargeted lipidomic analysis, whereas the third cohort was subjected to targeted lipid quantification. Untargeted lipidomic analysis was performed via ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with ion mobility quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC/IM-QTOF-MS). Targeted lipid quantification was conducted via UHPLC‒MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Lipid features were screened to construct a bile lipid classifier using the machine learning algorithm, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, followed by cross-validation in two cohorts. The selected lipid features were further validated by targeted quantification in the third cohort. The functions of the significantly differentially abundant lipids in proliferation were validated in CCA cell lines.

resultsIn total, 241 bile samples were collected and divided into three cohorts for independent lipidomic analysis: Cohort 1 included 32 CCA samples and 68 benign controls; Cohort 2 included 30 CCA samples and 30 benign controls; and Cohort 3 included 32 CCA samples and 49 benign controls. There were significant differences in the lipid profiles of the bile samples obtained from patients with CCA and individuals with benign disease, with multiple lipid classes, particularly lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), significantly downregulated in the CCA group. Multimodule correlation networks constructed via weighted lipid coexpression network analysis (WLCNA) revealed significant associations between lipid modules and clinical traits. A machine learning-based bile lipid classifier, termed BileLipid, was developed for CCA diagnosis; this classifier incorporates six lipid features. This classifier achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.943, 0.956, and 0.828 in Cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Additionally, the significantly downregulated lipid LPC in CCA bile was found to significantly inhibit the proliferation of CCA cell lines, suggesting its potential role as a protective factor in CCA.

conclusionsThis study not only identified lipidomic alterations in CCA using bile samples but also established and validated a bile lipid classifier with high specificity and sensitivity for distinguishing between CCA and benign bile duct diseases. Our findings highlight the potential of bile lipid biomarkers for improving the differential diagnosis and risk assessment of CCA and preventing potential overintervention in patients with benign biliary disease.

Indexed as

BileBile Duct DiseasesBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaLipidomicsLipidsAdultAgedChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityLipids

Identifiers

PMID40897822
PMCPMC12603035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.