ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025
Lipidomic profiling of human bile distinguishes cholangiocarcinoma from benign bile duct diseases with high specificity and sensitivity: a prospective descriptive study.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging omics diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Differences in the Biliary Microbiome Between Biliary Tract Cancer and Benign Biliary Disease.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Identification and validation of bile exosomal microRNA signatures for diagnosing acute rejection in liver transplant recipients.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- A Proteomics and Metabolomics-based Approach to Biomarkers Identification for the Early Diagnosis of Cholangiocarcinoma in a Hamster Model: A Preliminary Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Ligustilide: A Phytochemical with Potential in Combating Cancer Development and Progression-A Comprehensive and Critical Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An update on schistosomicide and tumoricide in the future: arachidonic acid.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare and highly aggressive malignancy originating in the bile ducts. Owing to limitations involving pathological sampling, the clinical differentiation of CCA from benign biliary diseases remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the differences between the bile lipidomes of CCA patients and those of patients with benign disease to develop a bile lipid classifier that can help to differentiate CCA from benign conditions.
methodsBile samples were collected by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) from patients with CCA or benign disease. The participants were divided into three cohorts: the first two cohorts underwent untargeted lipidomic analysis, whereas the third cohort was subjected to targeted lipid quantification. Untargeted lipidomic analysis was performed via ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with ion mobility quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC/IM-QTOF-MS). Targeted lipid quantification was conducted via UHPLC‒MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Lipid features were screened to construct a bile lipid classifier using the machine learning algorithm, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, followed by cross-validation in two cohorts. The selected lipid features were further validated by targeted quantification in the third cohort. The functions of the significantly differentially abundant lipids in proliferation were validated in CCA cell lines.
resultsIn total, 241 bile samples were collected and divided into three cohorts for independent lipidomic analysis: Cohort 1 included 32 CCA samples and 68 benign controls; Cohort 2 included 30 CCA samples and 30 benign controls; and Cohort 3 included 32 CCA samples and 49 benign controls. There were significant differences in the lipid profiles of the bile samples obtained from patients with CCA and individuals with benign disease, with multiple lipid classes, particularly lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), significantly downregulated in the CCA group. Multimodule correlation networks constructed via weighted lipid coexpression network analysis (WLCNA) revealed significant associations between lipid modules and clinical traits. A machine learning-based bile lipid classifier, termed BileLipid, was developed for CCA diagnosis; this classifier incorporates six lipid features. This classifier achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.943, 0.956, and 0.828 in Cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Additionally, the significantly downregulated lipid LPC in CCA bile was found to significantly inhibit the proliferation of CCA cell lines, suggesting its potential role as a protective factor in CCA.
conclusionsThis study not only identified lipidomic alterations in CCA using bile samples but also established and validated a bile lipid classifier with high specificity and sensitivity for distinguishing between CCA and benign bile duct diseases. Our findings highlight the potential of bile lipid biomarkers for improving the differential diagnosis and risk assessment of CCA and preventing potential overintervention in patients with benign biliary disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.