ArticleScientific reports2025
Design and application of species-specific primers to Quercus cerris roots' identification in urban forests.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Short-term effects of biochar amendment on root-microbe interactions in natural and peri-urban soils.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate species identification, the first crucial step for effective root studies, is a time-demanding, experience-based and error-prone process. Molecular methods are therefore needed to ensure this process, especially in urban settings where root sampling is challenging. Here, we developed a novel molecular method for root identification in complex environments. Specifically, we focused on detecting Quercus cerris-a species common in European cities and non-urban areas and used in afforestation-from bulk root samples, including those collected non-invasively. To achieve this, we conducted the first comprehensive analysis of candidate DNA regions to discriminate among Quercus species. Among the candidate sequences tested, ITS and ITS2 showed the highest discriminatory power compared to commonly used barcodes such as matK, psbA-trnH, rbcL, rpoC1, trnL-trnF. Based on this results, we designed specific primers to target ITS and ITS2 and we developed a PCR-based protocol capable of reliability and specificity detecting Q. cerris within mixed Quercus root samples. This method was then successfully applied to root bulk samples collected via excavation and non-invasive soil coring in the urban area of Campobasso (central Italy), with results validated through traditional identification techniques. The outcome is a novel, rapid, low-cost, and non-invasive molecular approach for monitoring Q. cerris roots. More broadly, this tool enable in situ root identification and mapping which support the study of root functioning and dynamics in ecosystems and is particularly valuable in challenging urban environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.