Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897773›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Risk factor identification mechanism for coronary artery disease based on multiple cross-filtering and binary cuckoo search.

Congjun Rao, Jing Wang, Ying Liu, Jing Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Congjun RaoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Jing WangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Ying LiuSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Jing YuanWuhan University of Technology Hospital, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China. yuanjin220@163.com.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities project under Grant 104972024KFYjc0069National Natural Science Foundation of China 72071150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major public health concern, necessitating accurate risk factor identification. However, existing methods often suffer from feature preference bias and insufficient multidimensional evaluation, limiting their reliability. To address this, we propose a novel two-stage mechanism integrating multiple cross-filtering and binary cuckoo search (BCS). In the first stage, features are evaluated from three perspectives-relevance (chi-square test), information richness (mutual information), and distance (Fisher score)-to eliminate low-importance features and reduce bias. In the second stage, a random forest classifier optimizes feature selection via BCS, using classification accuracy as the objective function. Empirical analysis on the UCI CAD dataset demonstrates that our method achieves an accuracy of 89%, precision of 0.87, recall of 0.91, F1-score of 0.89, and AUC of 0.93. These values outperform existing homogeneous models (Method II, Method III, Method IV) by at least 3.49%, 3.57%, 3.41%, 3.49%, and 3.33%, respectively. The results highlight superior computational efficiency and predictive performance, making the mechanism a valuable tool for CAD risk assessment.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseAlgorithmsHumansRisk FactorsBCSCoronary artery diseaseMultiple cross-filteringRisk factor identification mechanism

Identifiers

PMID40897773
PMCPMC12405467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.