ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated analysis of emotional expressions in dogs based on geometric morphometrics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Decoding of Animal Micro-Expressions: A Review of Methodological Advances and Translational Applications.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Acute pain sign recognition by dog owners in a home setting.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated analysis of facial expressions is a vibrant field in human affective computing, while research in nonhuman animals is still in its early stages. Compared to labour-intensive manual coding, automation can provide a more reliable and objective alternative, eliminating subjectivity and bias. However, using automated approaches of facial analysis in nonhuman animals "in the wild", i.e. outside of controlled laboratory conditions, is a challenge given the nature of noisy datasets. Here we present the first study using a fully automated analysis of facial landmarks associated with different emotional states in a morphologically diverse sample of pet dogs. We applied a novel AI-pipeline to study fear expressions of dogs in their home environment, analysing owner-provided video recordings during a real-life firework situation on New Year's Eve in comparison to a control evening without fireworks. Using a static geometric morphometrics-inspired analysis, the pipeline allows for quantifying dog facial expressions in an extremely noisy and diverse "in the wild" dataset, encompassing various breeds, angles and environments. We used an automated facial landmark system of 36 dog facial landmarks based on the Dog Facial Action Coding System. Due to the great variety in morphology of the included dogs, landmarks denoting the ear pinnae were excluded. Nonetheless, landmarks relating to the base of the ears differentiated most strongly between the conditions, suggesting backwards-drawn ears as the best indicator of the firework condition, which is in agreement with manually coded data. Additionally, the firework condition was associated with more mouth-opening, possibly reflecting panting in a subset of dogs. We conclude that automated analysis of dog facial expressions, based on the previously validated landmark system, is feasible in a diverse sample of pet dogs, paving the way towards automated emotion detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.