ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating factors influencing injury severity in crashes involving vulnerable road users in Pakistan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Road traffic crashes claim around 1.19 million lives annually worldwide, with over half of the fatalities involving vulnerable road users (VRUs). While several studies have explored the risk factors associated with specific categories of VRUs in Pakistan, research focusing on VRUs collectively, considering all categories and their unique safety challenges, remains limited. This study aims to examine the influence of various risk factors on the severity of injuries resulting from crashes involving VRUs, using a three-year dataset (2021-2023). The study evaluated the effectiveness of six boosting-based ensemble machine learning classifiers across multiple evaluation metrics. The findings indicated that boosting with decision stumps outperformed extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting, histogram-based gradient boosting, categorical boosting, and adaptive boosting in terms of recall, F
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.