Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897760›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Implicit Runge-Kutta based sparse identification of governing equations in biologically motivated systems.

Mehrdad Anvari, Hamidreza Marasi, Hossein Kheiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mehrdad AnvariDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, 51666-16471, Iran.
Hamidreza MarasiDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, 51666-16471, Iran. marasi@tabrizu.ac.ir.
Hossein KheiriDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, 51666-16471, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying governing equations in physical and biological systems from datasets remains a long-standing challenge across various scientific disciplines. Common methods like sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (SINDy) often rely on precise derivative approximations, making them sensitive to data scarcity and noise. This study presents a novel data-driven framework by integrating high order implicit Runge-Kutta methods (IRKs) with the sparse identification, termed IRK-SINDy. The framework exhibits remarkable robustness to data scarcity and noise by relying on the A-stability of IRKs and consequently their fewer limitations on stepsize. Two methods for incorporating IRKs into sparse regression are introduced: one employs iterative schemes for numerically solving nonlinear algebraic system of equations, while the other utilizes deep neural networks to predict stage values of IRKs. The performance of IRK-SINDy is demonstrated through numerical experiments on synthetic data in benchmark problems with varied dynamical behaviors, including linear and nonlinear oscillators, the Lorenz system, and biologically relevant models like predator-prey dynamics, logistic growth, and the FitzHugh-Nagumo model. Results indicate that IRK-SINDy outperforms conventional SINDy and the RK4-SINDy framework, particularly under conditions of extreme data scarcity and noise, yielding interpretable and generalizable models.

Indexed as

Deep learningDynamical systemsMachine learningModel discoverySparse regressionSystem identification

Identifiers

PMID40897760
PMCPMC12405529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.