Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897750›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A dual-stream deep learning framework for skin cancer classification using histopathological-inherited and vision-based feature extraction.

Saleh Ateeq Almutairi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saleh Ateeq AlmutairiDepartment of Computer Science and Informatics, Applied College, Taibah University, Madinah, 41461, Saudi Arabia. smoutiri@taibahu.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer, particularly melanoma, remains one of the most life-threatening forms of cancer worldwide, with early detection being critical for improving patient outcomes. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as dermoscopy and histopathology, are often limited by subjectivity, interobserver variability, and resource constraints. To address these challenges, this study proposes a dual-stream deep learning framework that combines histopathological-inherited and vision-based feature extraction for accurate and efficient skin lesion diagnosis. The framework uses the U-Net architecture for precise lesion segmentation, followed by a dual-stream approach: the first stream employs Virchow2, a pretrained model, to extract high-level histopathological embeddings, whereas the second stream uses Nomic, a vision-based model, to capture spatial and contextual information. The extracted features are fused and integrated to create a comprehensive representation of the lesion, which is then classified via a multilayer perceptron (MLP). The proposed approach is evaluated on the HAM10000 dataset, achieving a mean accuracy of 96.25% and a mean F1 score of 93.79% across 10 trials. Ablation studies demonstrate the importance of both feature streams, with the removal of either stream resulting in significant performance degradation. Comparative analysis with existing studies highlights the superiority of the proposed framework, which outperforms traditional single-modality approaches. The results underscore the potential of the dual-stream framework to enhance skin cancer diagnosis, offering a robust, interpretable, and scalable solution for clinical applications.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAlgorithmsDermoscopyHumansClassificationDeep learning (DL)Feature extractionHistopathology

Identifiers

PMID40897750
PMCPMC12405463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.