ArticleJournal of fish biology2025
Assessing metabolic rate and post-tagging recovery in juvenile fish.
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing metabolic rate and post-tagging recovery in juvenile fish.Journal of fish biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Juvenile fish play a crucial role in the health of aquatic ecosystems, serving both as the foundation for future adult populations and as a valuable food source. Studying the juvenile life stage of fish using acoustic telemetry is inherently challenging due to their small size and associated difficulties in tracking and data collection. Recent advances in telemetry, including the miniaturization of tags, have enabled researchers to investigate previously understudied size classes of fish. Tagging fish can introduce sublethal effects that alter their physiology and behaviour, ultimately biasing the collected data; this effect is exacerbated in smaller-bodied fish, which are generally more sensitive to tagging procedures. Our study tested whether tagging juvenile brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) of two size classes (10-12 and 13-16 cm fork length, n = 80) with a LOTEK JSATS PinTag (0.22 g, mean tag burden 1.11% of body mass, range 0.54-2.00%) impacted their oxygen consumption rates (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.