Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897656›Full record

ReviewInvestigative and clinical urology2025

Contemporary management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Jong Jin Oh, Sung Kyu Hong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Investigative and clinical urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dna aneuploidy and urothelial carcinoma: A meta-analysis.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jong Jin OhDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0448-5992
Sung Kyu HongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8344-6774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urothelial carcinoma, the most common malignancy of the urinary tract, presents a significant challenge, particularly in its metastatic stage, where prognosis remains poor despite advancements in treatment. Historically, platinum-based chemotherapy has been the standard first-line therapy, achieving moderate response rates but limited long-term survival. Recent breakthroughs have introduced immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and targeted therapies as more effective alternatives. Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab has demonstrated superior efficacy as a first-line treatment, improving overall survival (OS) and objective response rates compared to chemotherapy. Maintenance therapy with avelumab has further prolonged survival in patients responding to initial platinum-based chemotherapy. Additionally, sacituzumab govitecan, an ADC targeting Trop-2, and erdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, have provided promising options for patients with refractory disease or FGFR alterations. The evolving treatment paradigm now prioritizes biomarker-driven, personalized approaches over traditional chemotherapy-based regimens. However, challenges remain in optimizing treatment sequencing and managing toxicity. Future research should focus on refining patient selection criteria and exploring novel combination therapies to enhance efficacy and durability of response.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm MetastasisBladder cancerChemotherapyMetastasis

Identifiers

PMID40897656
PMCPMC12437573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.