Trial reportSleep health2025
Preliminary outcomes of healthy sleep practices and mind-body integrative health intervention among urban youth: Feasibility, acceptability, and initial impact.
Trial report in Sleep health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Community-engaged and Implementation Science-informed Pediatric Sleep Intervention Research.Current sleep medicine reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and initial effects of Sleeping Healthy, Living Healthy (SHLH), an integrated behavioral sleep-mind-body integrative health (MBIH) intervention to improve sleep health, among urban adolescents.
methodsSixty-one adolescents (66% female; 84% Hispanic/Latino; 25% Black or African American) who slept less than 8 h/weeknight from two NYC high school campuses were randomized to SHLH (n = 30) or an attention-control group (n = 31). Outcomes assessed at baseline, immediately postintervention, and 10 weeks postintervention included sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)); PROMIS sleep-related impairment; stress and anxiety; and perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale). Actigraphy data were collected at each assessment. Generalized linear mixed-effects models with a random subject effect tested effects on outcomes following the intent-to-treat principle.
resultsThe median number of sessions adolescents randomized to SHLH attended was 5.0 of seven sessions (interquartile range = 2.50-6.00). They reported high satisfaction with the intervention and used the MBIH techniques taught in the intervention at least once in the past week. Relative to controls, adolescents in SHLH had lower odds of reporting poor sleep quality (OR = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.02, 0.77, p = .026) and reported significant improvements in healthy sleep practices (β = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.04, 0.52, p = .019), PSQI global sleep quality scores (β = -1.52, 95% CI = -3.42, -0.25, p = .27), and PROMIS sleep-related impairment (β = -5.73, 95% CI = -9.42, -2.04, p = .002). They also reported significantly less perceived stress (β = -1.82, 95% CI: -2.88, -0.77). No differences in actigraphy-estimated sleep were observed.
conclusionsPreliminary evaluations of SHLH suggest that it is feasible to implement, acceptable to adolescents, and had favorable short-term improvements in sleep. Larger trials are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.