Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897524›Full record

ReviewBMJ paediatrics open2025

50 years of a nation-wide child development programme in India.

Vandana Prasad

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vandana PrasadPublic Health Resource Society, New Delhi, India chaukhat@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0640-4965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews the current status of the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme, India; the largest Early Childhood Care and Development (ECCD) programme in the world, at 50 years of its existence. While there has been substantial advance of this scheme in terms of coverage and quality, its thrust has remained on providing supplementary nutrition and much more needs to be done to achieve truly universal and comprehensive ECCD services. The major issues besetting favourable outcomes relate to inadequate investments resulting in poor infrastructure, inadequately remunerated and capacitated ICDS workers and an overcentralisation resulting in a critical lack of community engagement and contextual adaptation. Social legislation is likely to be required to promote the rights of very young children through the reinvigoration of this scheme.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentChild Health ServicesChildChild, PreschoolHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansIndiaInfantCaregiversChild HealthDeveloping CountriesGrowthHealth Policy

Identifiers

PMID40897524
PMCPMC12406827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.