Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897506›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2026

Increasing uptake of physical health checks for people living with severe mental illness: a systematic review.

Elizabeth Emsley, Sarah A Sullivan, Elizabeth Rose-Innes, Emma Sidebotham, Clare E French

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Moving beyond 'duel' diagnosis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth EmsleySouth West Public Health Training Programme, Severn Postgraduate Medical Education School of Public Health, Bristol, UK elizabeth.emsley@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0009-0005-2060-1545
Sarah A SullivanPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1446-8478
Elizabeth Rose-InnesSouth West Public Health Training Programme, Severn Postgraduate Medical Education School of Public Health, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-5327-5993
Emma SidebothamSouth West Public Health Training Programme, Severn Postgraduate Medical Education School of Public Health, Bristol, UK.
Clare E FrenchPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6943-7353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople living with severe mental illness (SMI) can experience greater risk of premature mortality than the general population with preventable physical ill health a major contributor. Physical health checks are a strategy to improve physical health but uptake is variable.

aimTo collate and assess the published evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to increase access to, and uptake of, physical health reviews for people living with SMI. DESIGN AND

settingThis was a systematic review.

methodThree databases (Medline, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) were searched for studies evaluating interventions aiming to increase access to and uptake of physical health checks for people with SMI. Searches were conducted during October and November 2024 for studies published from 2000 onwards. Studies were included that reported on outcomes of uptake or receipt of physical health checks or screening, including cancer screening. Both randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative non-randomised studies were eligible. Primary, secondary, and tertiary care settings were included. Studies from high-income countries were also included. Risk of bias was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB2), an adaptation of the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E), and Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools. Data synthesis involved an effect direction plot.

resultsOf 4437 identified studies, 12 were eligible. Intervention categories were case management (

conclusionThe study identified a scarcity of data and although a case-management approach shows promise there should be further robust and high-quality research.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningMental DisordersPhysical ExaminationHealth Services AccessibilityHumansadult psychiatrygeneral practicephysical health promotionprimary health carepublic healthsevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID40897506
PMCPMC13044186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.