Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897490›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Propofol-based versus sevoflurane-based anaesthesia for deceased donor kidney transplantation: the VAPOR-2 study protocol for an international multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Gerrie Joelle Julia Huisman, Stefan P Berger, Peter S Thyrrestrup, John Hausken, Denise P Veelo, Luis Guirado, Robert Pol, Luana L Jensen, Tor Inge Tønnessen, Frederike J Bemelman and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02727296 (Volatile Anesthetic Protection Of Renal Transplants 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02727296 phase4completednot on this map

Volatile Anesthetic Protection Of Renal Transplants 2

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2017 to 2025Enrolled488ConditionsDelayed Graft Function, Renal Outcome After Kidney Transplantation, Acute Rejection (AR) of Transplanted Kidney, Graft SurvivalArmssevoflurane, propofol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Abdominal Organ Transplantation: Noteworthy Literature in 2025.Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Gerrie Joelle Julia HuismanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3081-7500
Stefan P BergerDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Peter S ThyrrestrupDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
John HauskenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Denise P VeeloDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC (AUMC), Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6196-1671
Luis GuiradoDepartment of Nephrology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Robert PolDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2236-5233
Luana L JensenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tor Inge TønnessenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Frederike J BemelmanDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam UMC (AUMC), Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Carme FacundoDepartment of Nephrology, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.
VAPOR-2 STUDY GROUP
Katalin TamasiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9391-4597
Gerton LunterDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Bente JespersenDepartment of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Henri G D LeuveninkDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Michel M R F StruysDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Gertrude J Nieuwenhuijs-MoekeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands g.j.nieuwenhuijs-moeke@umcg.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIschaemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is inevitable in kidney transplantation and negatively affects patient and graft outcomes. Anaesthetic conditioning (AC) refers to the use of anaesthetic agents to mitigate IRI. AC is particularly associated with volatile anaesthetic (VA) agents and to a lesser extent to intravenous agents like propofol. VA like sevoflurane interferes with many of the processes underlying IRI and exerts renal protective properties in various models of injury and inflammation. We hypothesise that a sevoflurane-based anaesthesia is able to induce AC and thereby reduce post-transplant renal injury, reflected in improved graft and patient outcome, compared with a propofol-based anaesthesia in transplant recipients of a deceased donor kidney. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, controlled and prospective clinical trial with two parallel groups. The study will include 488 kidney transplant recipients from donation after brain death (DBD) or donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. Participants are randomised in a 1:1 design to a sevoflurane (intervention) or propofol (control) group. The primary endpoint is the incidence of delayed graft function in recipients of DCD and DBD donor kidneys and/or 1-year biopsy-proven and treated acute rejection. Secondary endpoints include functional delayed graft function defined as failure of serum creatinine levels to decrease by at least 10% per day for three consecutive days; primary non-function is defined as a permanent lack of function of the allograft; length of hospital stay and postoperative complications of all kinds, estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 week and 3 and 12 months calculated with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula; readmissions at 3 and 12 months, graft survival and all-cause mortality at 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the local ethical committees and national data security agencies. Results are expected to be published in 2025. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02727296.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousKidney TransplantationPropofolReperfusion InjurySevofluraneDelayed Graft FunctionFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTissue DonorsAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofolSevofluraneANAESTHETICSPropofolRandomized Controlled TrialRenal transplantationTransplant medicineTransplant surgery

Identifiers

PMID40897490
PMCPMC12410677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.