Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897416›Full record

SynthesisSaudi medical journal2025

Facilitators and barriers to mammogram screening uptake among Saudi women: A systematic review.

Sarah A Alkhaifi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Saudi medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sarah A AlkhaifiFrom the Department of Maternity and Childhood, School of Nursing, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0512-1691

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate current mammogram screening rates and identify barriers and facilitators for mammogram uptake among Saudi women.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA framework, beginning with a database search performed by 2 researchers using PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, and Google Scholar for pertinent studies published between 2000 and 2024. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included if they: a) were conducted in Saudi Arabia among Saudi women, b) explored factors associated with mammogram uptake among Saudi women, and c) were peer-reviewed. The socioecological model was used to thematically synthesize the results.

resultsA total of 39 studies were included in this review. Nine studies revealed low adherence to annual or biannual mammogram screenings among Saudi women. The socioecological model was utilized to categorize the factors that influenced Saudi women's uptake of mammograms, divided into: a) individual factors, including breast cancer and mammogram knowledge, demographic characteristics, health beliefs, fear, pain, and embarrassment; b) interpersonal factors, including male family members, health care providers, and competing priorities; and c) social factors, including health behaviors related to secondary health screenings, and the health care system.

conclusionTo improve adherence to mammogram screening among Saudi women, it is recommended to design interventions that target factors at each level of the socioecological model. Understanding how each factor functions as a barrier or facilitator will enable more effective and tailored strategies that address these factors within their respective socioecological levels.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMammographyMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMiddle AgedSaudi Arabiabreast cancermammographypublic health

Identifiers

PMID40897416
PMCPMC12441900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.