ArticleHospital pediatrics2025
Site-Specific Adaptation of an Inpatient Patient Navigator Program at 2 Children's Hospitals.
Article in Hospital pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe Family Bridge Program was developed at a single pediatric hospital to improve outcomes for hospitalized children from families of color, who are low income, or who speak a language other than English. The program uses a family navigator ("Guide") that supports families via 6 service domains: Language Access, Orientation to the Hospital, Communication Preferences and Coaching, Addressing Unmet Social Needs, Supportive Check-Ins, and Discharge Follow-Up. This study describes an analysis to translate the program to a second pediatric hospital.
methodsWe interviewed clinical and hospital staff with experience matching the program domains to identify Guide tasks and factors that could influence task performance between the 2 hospitals. The interview format and analysis were framed by a sociotechnical model to identify task-related factors (persons and roles, resources and tools, community and organizational characteristics…) and to develop adaptation and communication strategies for the Guide.
resultsWe interviewed 45 participants (22 at Hospital 1, 23 at Hospital 2), representing 14 clinical and staff roles. Analysis identified 57 tasks for the Guide across the 6 program domains. Multiple sociotechnical factors were identified that could impact task performance between and within both hospitals. Additional analysis identified sociotechnical factors and adaptation strategies for integrating the Guide with the clinical team.
conclusionsThe analysis facilitated a task-based adaptation of the Family Bridge Program to a second hospital by identifying and addressing sociotechnical differences between sites. This approach provides a framework for replicating the program at other hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.