Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897386›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)2026

"I got all sorts of solitude, but that solitude wasn't mine": A mixed-methods approach to understanding aloneness during becoming a mother.

Thuy-Vy Nguyen, Delali Konu, Deborah Tetteh, Pearl Tshimbalanga, Julie Weissova, Mingyao Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thuy-Vy NguyenDurham University, Durham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0777-4204
Delali KonuDurham University, Durham, UK.
Deborah TettehDurham University, Durham, UK.
Pearl TshimbalangaDurham University, Durham, UK.
Julie WeissovaDurham University, Durham, UK.
Mingyao XiongDurham University, Durham, UK.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/W002256/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the evolving experiences of "aloneness" in first-time mothers during their transition to motherhood. While the term is often used to describe new mothers' experiences, it tends to blur distinct yet overlapping constructs such as solitude, loneliness, and social isolation. Study 1 involved qualitative interviews with 22 mothers, revealing three themes: the ambivalent companionship of a baby, the multifaceted nature of post-motherhood aloneness, and a shift in priorities that diminished both the quantity and quality of solitude. Although mothers often spent more time physically alone, solitude free from caregiving demands became scarce, contributing to increased loneliness and isolation. Time alone with a baby was perceived variably, depending on interaction level and caregiving demands. Study 2 analysed one-week Ecological Momentary Assessment data from 47 new mothers, tracking daily activities and emotional well-being. Personal time (time spent for oneself) and social time were both linked to improved mood. These findings highlight the challenges of accessing restorative time when under sustained emotional and cognitive demands. Beyond early parenthood, this study extends solitude research by providing empirical evidence that subjective solitude is shaped not only by social presence or absence but also by the psychological load imposed by social demands.

Indexed as

LonelinessMother-Child RelationsMothersSocial IsolationAdultFemaleHumansQualitative ResearchYoung Adultdevelopmentearly childhoodhealthsocialwell‐being/happiness

Identifiers

PMID40897386
PMCPMC12783874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.