ArticleBone & joint open2025
Prior hip arthroscopy impacts long-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty : a propensity-matched study with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking preservation: The case for timely hip arthroplasty in young adult hip pathology.Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The objective of this study was to perform a long-term comparative analysis of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a history of previous ipsilateral hip arthroscopy (PA) to a propensity-score matched control group of primary THA with no prior hip arthroscopy (NPA). Methods: Data were analyzed from patients who underwent primary THA for symptomatic hip osteoarthritis between November 2010 and November 2013. Patients included had completed a minimum of ten years of patient-reported outcome measure questionnaires. The PA group was propensity-score matched 1:1 based on age at THA, BMI, sex, robotic assistance, approach, and laterality to the NPA group. Clinical hip arthroplasty outcome thresholds, complications, and revision surgery rates were compared between cohorts. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess survivorship. Results: A total of 108 patients were included, 54 in each group. The groups displayed comparable outcomes at minimum ten-year follow-up, for modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) (p = 0.370), Harris Hip Score (HHS) (p = 0.370), Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR) (p = 0.380), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) (p = 0.250), visual analogue scale (VAS; p = 0.150), and patient satisfaction (p = 0.310). The two groups reached Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for FJS, HHS, and HOOS-JR at similar rates (p > 0.05). The PA group exhibited a significantly higher complication rate, with 11 major complications compared to two in the NPA group, translating to a relative risk of 2.8 (p < 0.033). Among the major complications in the PA group, nine required revision surgery, resulting in a relative risk of 4.5 (p < 0.047). Conclusion: Patients undergoing primary THA with a history of prior hip arthroscopy achieve similar long-term functional outcomes compared to a propensity-matched control group. However, they face a 2.8-fold increased risk of complications and a 4.5-fold higher risk of major complications requiring revision THA.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.