ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2025
Emerging innovation, artificial intelligence, and digital technology in esophagology.
Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging innovation, artificial intelligence, and digital technology in esophagology.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New medical technology and techniques provide opportunities for better, faster care for patients with esophageal diseases, spanning robotics and minimally invasive techniques, artificial intelligence, medical devices, and digital health that are changing how to diagnose and manage patients with both benign and malignant esophageal diseases. We conducted a concise narrative review of recent advances in esophagology from the perspectives of innovators and physicians alike, with an emphasis on ensuring the environment around successful innovation over the next decade. To our knowledge, this is the first innovation-oriented review centered on the clinical field of esophagology, focusing on applicable content and knowledge gaps across the several individual domains covered in this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.