ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Risk-averse parenting: bumble bees prioritize metal avoidance over sugar intake to safeguard offspring.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Fate of Orally Ingested Microplastics During Cooperative Brood Care in Two Social Hymenoptera Species.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Risk-averse parenting: bumble bees prioritize metal avoidance over sugar intake to safeguard offspring.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metal pollution poses a growing threat to wildlife, including bees, which play a crucial role in pollination. While the toxic effects of metals on bees are well documented, their ability to avoid contaminated food sources, and whether this behaviour is shaped by social context, remains unclear. Using the buff-tailed bumble bee and two metals, copper (i.e. essential metal) and cadmium (i.e. non-essential metal), we first assessed workers' avoidance of metal-laced 50% sucrose solutions when given the choice of an uncontaminated alternative. We introduced an energetic trade-off situation by reducing sucrose concentration to 20% in the untreated solution. Finally, to test the influence of brood care, workers were kept either with or without larval siblings. When both treated and untreated solutions contained 50% sucrose, workers consistently avoided the metal-contaminated solution, regardless of brood presence. However, when sucrose concentration was reduced in the uncontaminated solution, workers preferred the contaminated option, but only in the absence of brood. In the presence of brood, workers favoured the metal-free but sucrose-poor solution, suggesting adaptive provisioning behaviour to protect larvae. This study provides the first evidence that bumble bee workers not only actively avoid metal-contaminated solutions but also adjust foraging strategies based on social context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.