ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2025
Engineering and comparison of cas12a-based genome editing systems in plants.
Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment of an efficient and PAM-relaxed LbCas12a genome editing tool in plants.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Efficient CRISPR/Cas-SF01 genome editing tools with high editing efficiency in allotetraploid oilseed rape.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- CasY7: An optimized Cas12i system for enhanced genome editing in monocot crops.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- Functional Analysis of the Heat-Tolerance Candidate GenePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While Cas9 and Cas12a are both RNA-guided endonucleases used for genome editing, only Cas12a is able to process pre-crRNA via its additional ribonuclease activity. This feature reduces the complexity of Cas12a versus Cas9-based genome editing systems thus providing an attractive alternative for generating site-specific mutations in plants. Here we aimed to improve the efficiency of the cas12a-based generation of two double-strand breaks flanking the open reading frame of a target gene, leading to its full deletion. To this end, we compared the relative impact of different components on cas12a-based gene deletion efficiency in three different eudicotyledons, Arabidopsis thaliana, Lotus japonicus, and Nicotiana benthamiana. We detected the highest cas12a-based editing efficiency with a combination of suitable promoters for crRNA and cas12a expression, a tandem terminator to control cas12a expression, a re-coded cas12a, adapted to the codon usage of Arabidopsis and engineered to carry introns, and encoding a Cas12a flanked by a nuclear localization signal at both ends. Our work revealed the high potential for improving cas12a-based genome editing systems for plant genetic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.