Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40897309›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025

Structural colour in red seaweeds is more common and diverse than has been presumed.

Margot Arnould-Pétré, Silvia Vignolini, Juliet Brodie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Margot Arnould-PétréResearch, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2022-6037
Silvia VignoliniSustainable and Bio-inspired Materials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0664-1418
Juliet BrodieResearch, Natural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7622-2564

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brightest colorations observed in nature are the result of structural colour, a physical phenomenon relying not on pigments but on the interactions of light with nanostructured materials. Research on structural colour in seaweeds has been growing and hints that the phenomenon is considerably more widespread in these organisms than previously understood. In this review, we combine information from published literature, herbarium specimens and our own observations to clearly outline and reframe the current state of knowledge on the phenomenon in red seaweeds (Rhodophyta). We describe structural colour and the structures responsible for it in rhodophytes, identifying clear categories and their variations. Through an overview of the phylogenetic, geographic and ecological distribution of the phenomenon, we confirm that it is more widespread and diverse than had been indicated by casual recording. We finally discuss hypotheses on the biological significance of structural colour for red seaweeds. Our investigation emphasizes the need for more extensive research in order to fully assess the evolutionary mechanisms at play, the development of the nanostructures and their relation to environmental conditions. This review provides a framework for understanding and classifying structural colour in red algae to encourage a more comprehensive reporting of the phenomenon.

Indexed as

PigmentationPigments, BiologicalRhodophytaSeaweedColorPhylogenyPigments, Biologicaldistribution of structural colouriridescent bodiesiridescent seaweedsmarine macroalgaemultilayersnanostructured organellesphylogeneticsrhodophytesstructural colour mechanismsstructurally coloured macroalgae

Identifiers

PMID40897309
PMCPMC12404814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.