Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896823›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025

Exploring Speech and Language Therapists' Perspectives of Voice-Assisted Technology as a Tool for Dysarthria: Qualitative Study.

Jodie Mills, Orla Duffy, Katy Pedlow, George Kernohan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jodie MillsSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0960-0568
Orla Duffy *School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3729-7576
Katy Pedlow *School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7127-9032
George KernohanSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1309-446X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople living with Parkinson disease (PD) often experience low speech volume and reduced intelligibility. Research suggests that common voice-assisted technology (VAT) devices, like Amazon Alexa and Google Home, can encourage individuals to modify their speech, speaking more clearly, slowly, and loudly. This highlights the potential of VAT as a therapeutic clinical tool in speech and language therapy (SLT). However, while VAT is emerging as a novel health care technology, gaps exist regarding understanding speech and language therapists' (SaLTs) experiences using these devices in clinical practice for PD-related speech and voice difficulties.

objectiveThis research set out to explore various experiences of using VAT to address hypokinetic dysarthria, secondary to PD, from a range of stakeholder perspectives. This paper specifically focuses on clinical insights from SaLTs.

methodsSaLTs with prior experience of using smart speakers in clinical practice with people with speech or voice difficulties were invited to participate in focus groups or interviews. Between September and December 2024, seven SaLTs participated in semistructured focus groups or interviews using a topic guide. Discussions were informed by published evidence. Results were transcribed and analyzed using a framework analysis approach and were managed through NVivo software (Lumivero).

resultsFour main themes were identified across the groups: (1) potential for VAT in SLT, (2) managing therapeutic beige flags, (3) empowering SaLTs to become digitally enabled practitioners, and (4) envisioning the future of VAT in SLT.

conclusionsThis study recognizes VAT's potential as a therapeutic tool that may improve volume, clarity, intelligibility of speech, and facilitate at-home practice for people with PD. However, before VAT can be widely implemented, considerations around data privacy, device limitations, and practical integration into clinical care must be addressed. Future research is proposed to design solutions to address usability challenges for both clients and clinicians. Finally, this paper offers key clinical recommendations for the development of a therapeutic VAT tool for speech and voice difficulties in SLT.

Indexed as

dysarthriaParkinson diseasesmart speakersspeech and language therapyvoice disorder

Identifiers

PMID40896823
PMCPMC12441644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.