Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896820›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mental health2025

Web-Based Interactive Training for Managers (Managing Minds at Work) to Promote Mental Health at Work: Pilot Feasibility Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Juliet Hassard, Holly Blake, Teixiera Mishael Dulal-Arthur, Alexandra Frost, Craig Bartle, Joanna Yarker, Fehmidah Munir, Ben Vaughan, Guy Daly, Caroline Meyer and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05154019 (Managing Minds at Work), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05154019 nacompletednot on this map

Managing Minds at Work: A Feasibility Pilot Cluster Randomised Control Trial for Online Interactive Training for Managers (Managing Minds at Work)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2021 to 2023Enrolled224ConditionsOccupational Stress, Occupational Neurosis, Mental Health Wellness 1, AbsenceArmsManaging Minds at Work Online Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Juliet HassardQueen's Business School, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3662-052X
Holly BlakeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3080-2306
Teixiera Mishael Dulal-ArthurQueen's Business School, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-1523-0101
Alexandra FrostInstitute of Mental Health, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6339-6386
Craig BartleSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1038-0639
Joanna YarkerBirkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6360-7350
Fehmidah MunirSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5585-0243
Ben VaughanSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1449-3286
Guy DalyOffice of the Provost, British University in Egypt, Cario, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-0495-6849
Caroline MeyerMedical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0684-299X
Sean RussellMedical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-3820-3634
Louise ThomsonSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1736-7506

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLine managers play a key role in preventing poor mental health but often lack necessary skills and knowledge. Existing interventions typically focus on mental health awareness rather than practical skills. The evidence-based Managing Minds at Work (MMW) web-based training program was developed to address this gap by enhancing line managers' confidence and competence in prevention.

objectiveThis study piloted the MMW intervention to assess its feasibility. Objectives included evaluating (1) uptake potential across small, medium, and large companies; (2) perceived suitability and effectiveness of the intervention; and (3) feasibility of outcome data collection methods.

methodsWe conducted a 2-arm pilot cluster randomized controlled trial of a self-guided, web-based training intervention for line managers. Twenty-four organizations were randomly assigned to the MMW intervention or a 3-month waitlist. A total of 224 line managers completed baseline measures (intervention: n=141, 62.9%; control: n=83, 37.1%), along with 112 of their direct reports (intervention: n=74, 66.1%; control: n=38, 33.9%). Follow-up data were collected at 3 and 6 months. Semistructured interviews with line managers and stakeholders (n=20) explored experiences with the study and intervention, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Line managers also completed feedback forms after each of the 5 MMW modules.

resultsThe recruitment of organizations and line managers exceeded targets, and retention rates of line managers were good at 3 months (161/224, 71.9%) but not at the 6-month follow-up (55/224, 24.6%). Feedback on the intervention was very positive, indicating that line managers and organizational stakeholders found the intervention acceptable, usable, and useful. We observed significant improvements with moderate to large effect sizes for all trial outcomes for line managers in the intervention arm from baseline to the 3-month follow-up. Line managers completed a variety of questionnaires, which showed increased scores for confidence in creating a mentally healthy workplace (intervention group: mean change 3.8, SD 3.2; control group: mean change 0.6, SD 3.2), mental health knowledge (intervention group: mean change 1.9, SD 3.0; control group: mean change 0.2, SD 2.9), psychological well-being (intervention group: mean change 3.6, SD 8.3; control group: mean change -0.7, SD 7.7), and mental health literacy at work (intervention group: mean change 11.8, SD 8.9; control group: mean change 0.8, SD 6.2). Collecting data from direct reports in both study arms was challenging, with results inconclusive regarding observed changes in trial outcomes. Time constraints and workload were commonly cited barriers to completion of the intervention.

conclusionsThis pilot feasibility trial provides strong evidence for the usability and acceptability of the MMW digital training and the research design. MMW shows potential to improve line managers' confidence and competencies in promoting mental health. The study also identified key considerations for future large-scale implementation and evaluation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05154019; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05154019.

Indexed as

Health PromotionInternet-Based InterventionMental HealthWorkplaceAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPilot Projectsfeasibility pilot studyline managersmental health at workweb-based training intervention

Identifiers

PMID40896820
PMCPMC12441645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.