ArticleIEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2025
VisR Ultrasound Improves Diagnosis of Breast Cancer by the Elastogram-to-B-Mode Ratio in a Blinded Reader Study.
Article in IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- VESTA: Machine Learning-Enabled Estimation of ViscoElastic Ratios from On-Axis Spatio-Temporal ARFI Features.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound elastography is increasingly being used alongside mammography for breast cancer diagnosis, particularly in women with radiographically dense breasts. The elastogram-to-B-Mode ratio (E/B), which compares lesion sizes in B-Mode and stiffness images, has been shown to differentiate malignant (E/B >1) from benign (E/B <1) masses. However, the diagnostic utility of E/B has not yet been evaluated using viscosity images, despite viscosity being an emerging biomarker for malignancy. Furthermore, neglecting viscosity can confound elasticity estimation in viscoelastic media like breast tissue. To address this limitation, we used Viscoelastic Response (VisR) ultrasound to assess the diagnostic value of E/B derived from both relative stiffness (RE) and relative viscosity (RV) images. In a blinded reader study, E/B values from viscosity images exhibited similar trends (>1 in malignant lesions and <1 in benign lesions) to those observed in stiffness images. Additionally, E/B values calculated from RE alone, RV alone, or a combination of RE and RV achieved 4-16% higher AUCs for discriminating malignant lesions compared to E/B derived solely from Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) peak displacement. These results suggest that incorporating VisR-derived viscosity and elasticity metrics into E/B calculations could significantly improve diagnostic accuracy for breast cancer detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.