ReviewIndian journal of nephrology
Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology: Pioneering Precision with Multimodal Intelligence.
Review in Indian journal of nephrology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming hemodialysis care: a tripartite collaboration model among medical staff, AI agents, and robots.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Dialysis Therapies:Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- The evolving field of nephrology: what comes next? A report from the European Renal Association Scientific Advisory Board.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Modelling for Precision Dosing of Immunosuppressants in Kidney Transplantation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in membranous nephropathy: transforming clinical management toward precision medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly advancing tool in healthcare, which might have significant implications in nephrology. Integrating AI, particularly through models like GPT-3 and GPT-4, has potential in medical education and diagnostics, achieving accuracy in clinical assessments. AI's ability to analyze large, complex datasets from diverse modalities (electronic health records, imaging, and genetic data) might enable early detection, personalized treatment planning, and clinical decision-making. Key developments include AI-driven chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury predictive models, which utilize machine learning algorithms to predict risk factors and disease onset, thereby allowing timely intervention. AI is enhancing non-invasive diagnostics like retinal imaging to detect kidney disease biomarkers, offering a promising and cost-effective approach to early disease detection. Despite these advancements, AI implementation in clinical practice faces challenges, including the need for robust data integration, model generalizability across diverse patient populations, and ethical and regulatory standards adherence. Maintaining transparency, explainability, and patient trust is crucial for AI's successful deployment in nephrology. This article explores AI's role in kidney care, covering its diagnostic applications, outcome prediction, and treatment, with references to recent studies that highlight its potential and current limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.