Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896553›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2025

Assessment of real-world, prospective outcomes in patients treated with cervical radiofrequency ablation for chronic pain (RAPID).

David A Provenzano, Bradley Holt, Michael Danko, Joseph Atallah, Maaz Iqbal, Binit Shah, Albert Singh, Harsh Sachdeva, Ella Ver Donck, Bart Liebrand and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04673032 (Radiofrequency), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04673032 completednot on this map

Radiofrequency (RF) Ablation Prospective Outcomes Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBoston Scientific CorporationRan2020 to 2025Enrolled298ConditionsPain, ChronicArmsRadiofrequency Ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

David A ProvenzanoPain Diagnostics and Interventional Care, Sewickley, PA, USA.
Bradley HoltTucson Orthopaedic Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Michael DankoPremier Pain Treatment Institute, Loveland, OH, USA.
Joseph AtallahThe Toledo Clinic, Toledo, OH, USA.
Maaz IqbalElite Pain and Spine Institute, Mesa, AZ, USA.
Binit ShahCarolinas Pain Center, Huntersville, NC, USA.
Albert SinghQuincy Medical Group, Quincy, IL, USA.
Harsh SachdevaUC Health Pain Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Ella Ver DonckAZ Sint-Jan, Bruges, Belgium.
Bart LiebrandSt. Anna Hospital, Geldrop, Netherlands.
Erik ShawShepherd Center, Shepherd Pain Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sherri HaasTwin Cities Pain Clinic & Surgery Center, Edina, MN, USA.
Rajat SekharSt. Vincent's Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT, USA.
Ann PanBoston Scientific Neuromodulation, Valencia, CA, USA.
Daniel S HalperinBoston Scientific Neuromodulation, Valencia, CA, USA.
Edward GoldbergBoston Scientific Neuromodulation, Valencia, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical facet joint syndrome (CFJS) is a common cause of chronic neck pain. While numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for facetogenic pain, its use in treating CFJS remains a subject of ongoing debate. Objective: Here, we sought to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes in cervical RFA-treated patients with chronic cervical facetogenic pain. Methods: The RAPID study (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04673032) is an international, multicenter, prospective study of patients using a commercially-available radiofrequency ablation system for the treatment of chronic pain, provided per standard of care. Patients were monitored at study follow-up visits (1-, 3-. 6-, 12-, and 24-months post-index procedure). Key clinical endpoint measures collected and evaluated include numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (functional disability, ODI), EQ-5D-5L (quality-of-life), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Results: A total of 56 patients were enrolled in this cervical facetogenic pain cohort. At both 6 (n = 49) and 12 months (n = 40), mean NPRS pain scores significantly decreased from a baseline of 6.0 ± 1.9 to 3.3 ± 2.8 and 3.3 ± 2.2, respectively (p < 0.0001). Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores also improved, dropping by 7.9- and 9.7-points from a baseline of 32.7 (p < 0.0001). Treatment response rates (≥50 % pain relief) were 81 % at 1 month and 80 % at 12 months. Improvements in quality-of-life (EQ-5D-5L) and self-reported change (PGIC) were also consistently observed. Conclusions: The cervical RFA cohort in the RAPID study demonstrated consistent, clinically meaningful improvements in pain, function, quality-of-life, and treatment satisfaction across all follow-up visits, underscoring the real-world effectiveness of RFA for appropriately selected patients with cervical facetogenic pain.

Indexed as

CervicalCervical facet joint syndromeNeck painRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID40896553
PMCPMC12398795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.