Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896534›Full record

ArticlePsychology in Russia : state of the art2025

Age-Related and Sex Differences in Visuospatial Working Memory and Its Association with Math Achievement: Insights from Span, Accuracy, and RT in Corsi Block Tapping Test.

Sergey B Malykh, Yulia V Kuzmina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology in Russia : state of the art, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sergey B MalykhFederal Scientific Center for Psychological and Interdisciplinary Research, Moscow, Russia.
Yulia V KuzminaFederal Scientific Center for Psychological and Interdisciplinary Research, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Visuospatial working memory (VSWM) is critical for academic achievement, particularly in mathematics. The Corsi Block-Tapping Test (CBTT) is one of the most widely used tools to assess VSWM, traditionally relying on span length as the primary performance indicator. However, recent research suggests that additional metrics, such as accuracy and reaction time (RT), may offer complementary insights. Despite this, RT remains underexplored in studies examining VSWM development and its links to academic outcomes such as math performance. Objective: To investigate age- and sex-related changes in VSWM using CBTT accuracy, span, and RT, and to examine how these metrics relate to math achievement across school grades and sexes. Design: Data were collected from 2,749 Russian pupils (53% girls), aged 10 to 18 years (M = 13.89, SD = 2.08), enrolled in grades 5 to 11 in two regions (Nizhny Novgorod and Irkutsk). Regression analysis was applied to three indicators of CBTT and math achievement that was measured by average school grades. Results: CBTT accuracy increased and RT decreased from grades 5 to 8, then both increased post-grade 9, suggesting a developmental shift. Accuracy predicted math grades in grades 5-9 but not later; RT was a stable negative predictor across all grades. Sex did not moderate VSWM-math associations, though girls showed greater RT efficiency in late adolescence. Conclusion: VSWM develops along non-linear trajectories that differ by metric. Multi-indicator assessment is essential, and school grades should be interpreted with caution as proxies for math ability.

Indexed as

age differenceCorsi Block Tapping Testmath achievementsex differencevisuo-spatial working memory

Identifiers

PMID40896534
PMCPMC12398182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.