ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Immunogenicity and safety of self-amplifying mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (ARCT-2303), with or without co-administration of seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine in adults: a phase 3, randomised, controlled, observer-blind, multicentre study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06279871 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Observer-blind, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity, and Safety of a Self-Amplifying RNA COVID-19 Vaccine), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Observer-blind, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity, and Safety of a Self-Amplifying RNA COVID-19 Vaccine (ARCT-2303), Administered Concomitantly With Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines, in Adults
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) and circular RNA (circRNA) vaccines: Progress, evidence gaps, and translational pathways for durable and scalable immunization.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- mRNA Vaccines for Influenza: Hope for a Universal Vaccine?BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Review
- Review
- Self-amplifying RNA-based CAR T cell therapy with enhanced duration and multi-genic logic functions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Determinants of success and failure of antibody-based strategies against respiratory viruses: insights from RSV and SARS-CoV-2.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A recently licenced self-amplifying mRNA (sa-mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine induces a robust, broad, and long-lasting immune response, extending the arsenal of efficacious COVID-19 countermeasures. We ran a clinical study to assess the benefits of vaccine strain update and the feasibility of co-administration with influenza vaccines. Methods: Between March 27, 2024 and April 10, 2025, we performed a randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study with 1499 adult participants to compare immune responses of sa-mRNA vaccine, encoding spike glycoprotein of the XBB.1.5 subvariant (ARCT-2303), with vaccine encoding the ancestral strain (ARCT-154), as measured by geometric mean titres of neutralising antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody seroconversion rates against the Omicron XBB.1.5, and to assess the immunological non-inferiority of co-administered ARCT-2303 and influenza vaccines compared with separately administered vaccines, as measured by neutralising antibodies against Omicron XBB.1.5.6 and haemagglutinin inhibition against influenza vaccine strains. Reactogenicity (adverse events on Days 1-7) and safety (adverse events on Days 1-181) were also assessed. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT06279871). Findings: The geometric mean ratio (ARCT-2303/ARCT-154) of neutralising antibodies against Omicron XBB.1.5.6 on Day 29 was 2.7 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-3.2), and the seroconversion rate difference was 28.4% (21.8-34.9); both met the prespecified superiority criteria. Concomitant administration of ARCT-2303 had no impact on the immune response to the quadrivalent influenza vaccine antigens, whether the non-adjuvanted vaccine given to 18‒64 year-old adults or the adjuvanted vaccine given to adults 65 years and older. The non-inferiority of the immune response against Omicron XBB.1.5.6 was also demonstrated when ARCT-2303 was co-administered or administered separately. Interpretation: We conclude that ARCT-2303 induces a robust immune response against the vaccine variant of SARS-CoV-2 and can be co-administered with licenced influenza vaccines in adults with no impact on the safety or immunogenicity of either vaccine. Funding: The study is funded by CSL under a collaboration agreement with Arcturus Therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.