ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Age-specific protective effects of statins against cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver enzyme elevation associated with metabolic dysfunction: a retrospective cohort study of electronic health records.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Statin Therapy on the Overall Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience.Cancers · 2026Article
- Simvastatin in liver diseases: therapeutic value and research advances.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Association of Statin Use with Reduced Primary Liver Cancer Risk, Independent of Age and Cirrhosis Protection in MASLD.Cancers · 2026Article
- Ion channel gene signature for diagnosis and antifibrotic therapy in liver fibrosis.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The hepatoprotective effects of statins in chronic liver diseases are well-documented; however, variation by age, sex, and formulation remains unclear. The optimal regimen for cirrhosis prevention has yet to be defined. We aimed to address this knowledge gap. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study using Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic health records, we defined a cohort of patients with chronic liver enzyme elevation primarily associated with metabolic dysfunction, between Jan 1, 2007, and Dec 31, 2009. Patients were followed-up for incident cirrhosis for a 10-year period until 2019. Time to cirrhosis was analysed using Cox proportional hazards models, with and without adjustment for demographics, relevant comorbidities, and co-medications. Hazard ratio (HR) estimates were used to compare event rates between groups. We also assessed potential effect modification by age and sex and evaluated differences across statin formulations. Findings: In adjusted models, baseline statin use was significantly associated with a reduced risk of cirrhosis over 10 years (HR 0.74 [95% confidence interval 0.70-0.78], p < 0.0001). Cumulative statin dose, standardised by low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-lowering intensity as simvastatin-equivalent units, and duration were dose-dependently associated with cirrhosis risk reduction (p < 0.05). The protective effect of statin use, at baseline and during follow-up, demonstrated a significant effect modification with age (p ≤ 0.01), with greater protection in older individuals. No sex disparities were observed. Borderline to significant protection against cirrhosis was achieved with a daily dose of ≥6961 mg simvastatin-equivalent for at least 245 days per year among individuals aged ≥54 years. Those younger than 54 years required a higher dose (>15,561 mg annually) to achieve comparative protection. No significant differences in effectiveness were observed among different formulations. Interpretation: Statins reduce cirrhosis risk in a dose- and age-dependent manner. A daily dose equivalent to ≥20 mg simvastatin (or >40 mg for <54 years) appears effective, regardless of formulation. Independent validation in a cohort with a higher proportion of women is warranted. Funding: The Department of Defence, Translational Team Science Award.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.