ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Multi-analyte liquid biopsy approaches for early detection of esophageal cancer: the expanding role of ctDNA.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early esophageal cancer diagnosis in Central Oromia, Ethiopia: patient and provider perspectives on barriers and facilitators.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Role of liquid biopsy in the multimodal assessment and treatment of esophageal cancer: a surgical perspective.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy biomarkers for early detection of gastrointestinal cancers: Current landscape and emerging technologies.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Perioperative circulating tumor DNA profiling for recurrence risk in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: moving toward a biology-driven surveillance model.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Digital immune twins and ai-integrated multi-omic biomarkers: Redefining personalized immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Case Report: Evolution and targeted therapy of an EGFR-mutant large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker for the early detection of esophageal cancer (EC), offering a minimally invasive means to assess tumor-derived genomic and epigenomic alterations. This review synthesizes current data on ctDNA biology, detection technologies, diagnostic performance, and clinical applicability in both esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. We conducted a comprehensive literature review of PubMed-indexed studies on ctDNA in EC, emphasizing recent (January 1, 2019- December 31, 2024) findings, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Key data on ctDNA characteristics, diagnostic performance in both early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, and clinical outcomes were extracted. We also discuss technical and clinical challenges in ctDNA assays and future perspectives for integrating ctDNA evaluation into clinical practice. We highlight technological innovations such as methylation profiling, fragmentomics, and ultrasensitive sequencing, and compare ctDNA-based approaches to alternative non-endoscopic modalities. While early studies report encouraging sensitivity and specificity for ctDNA in high-risk populations, specifically with methylation assays, current data remain limited by small sample sizes, retrospective design, low tumor DNA abundance, and heterogeneity in assay methodology. Furthermore, the clinical implementation of ctDNA-based screening must address population-level feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and health equity. We conclude that ctDNA holds significant potential for early EC detection but remains investigational pending validation in large prospective cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.