Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896428›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Multi-analyte liquid biopsy approaches for early detection of esophageal cancer: the expanding role of ctDNA.

Derek Tai, Kareem Latif, Pranati Shah, Daniel Park, Christiana Crook, Sofia Guzman, Gagandeep Brar, Daneng Li, Dani Castillo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Derek TaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, United States.
Kareem LatifDepartment of Internal Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, United States.
Pranati ShahDepartment of Internal Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, United States.
Daniel ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco Fresno, Fresno, CA, United States.
Christiana CrookDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Sofia GuzmanDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Gagandeep BrarDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Daneng LiDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Dani CastilloDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker for the early detection of esophageal cancer (EC), offering a minimally invasive means to assess tumor-derived genomic and epigenomic alterations. This review synthesizes current data on ctDNA biology, detection technologies, diagnostic performance, and clinical applicability in both esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. We conducted a comprehensive literature review of PubMed-indexed studies on ctDNA in EC, emphasizing recent (January 1, 2019- December 31, 2024) findings, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Key data on ctDNA characteristics, diagnostic performance in both early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, and clinical outcomes were extracted. We also discuss technical and clinical challenges in ctDNA assays and future perspectives for integrating ctDNA evaluation into clinical practice. We highlight technological innovations such as methylation profiling, fragmentomics, and ultrasensitive sequencing, and compare ctDNA-based approaches to alternative non-endoscopic modalities. While early studies report encouraging sensitivity and specificity for ctDNA in high-risk populations, specifically with methylation assays, current data remain limited by small sample sizes, retrospective design, low tumor DNA abundance, and heterogeneity in assay methodology. Furthermore, the clinical implementation of ctDNA-based screening must address population-level feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and health equity. We conclude that ctDNA holds significant potential for early EC detection but remains investigational pending validation in large prospective cohorts.

Indexed as

biomarkerCtDNAearly detectionesophageal adenocarcinomaesophageal canceresophageal squamous cell carcinomaliquid biopsysurveillance

Identifiers

PMID40896428
PMCPMC12390799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.