ReviewResearch (Washington, D.C.)2025
Ionic Transport Aspects of Water Electrolysis in Alkaline Media.
Review in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual-Confinement Strategy Enables Highly Efficient Oxygen Reduction with Fe-NResearch (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water electrolysis is a key industrial process for producing green hydrogen. To avoid the use of noble metals and fluorinated polymer membranes, liquid water electrolysis is often carried out in alkaline conditions. It is common to distinguish between 3 processes: alkaline electrolysis at high electrolyte concentrations (≥7 M) with porous membranes, alkaline electrolysis at high electrolyte concentrations (≥7 M) with ion-solvating membranes, and alkaline electrolysis at moderate electrolyte concentrations (<2 M) with anion-exchange membranes. Here, we consider the fundamental aspects of water and ion fluxes and of conductivity across the 3 types of membranes. We discuss ionic currents governed by ion-ion interactions and those resulting from a Grotthuss mechanism. Furthermore, in the case of porous membranes made of a polymeric fabric with compressed inorganic fillers such as zirconia, which are negatively charged in the presence of KOH, and of ion-solvating membranes such as polybenzimidazole, which also become negatively charged by deprotonation at high pH, those membranes should be a weak cation exchanger. We here address this dichotomy. All in all, we show that in all 3 cases, the membrane is an anion exchanger where hydroxide ion mobility differs from that of adjacent aqueous solution due to confinement favoring a Grotthuss-type transport and a jump mechanism.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.