ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025
Effectiveness of Washington State's hub and spoke model to improve opioid use disorder outcomes.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment for Comorbid Mental Health Disorders Among Patients Treated for Opioid Disorder: The Role of a Hub and Spoke Intervention.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Innovative strategies remain necessary to increase utilization of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), an effective approach to reduce overdoses and deaths. The hub and spoke (HS) model is increasingly used to improve MOUD treatment, yet the impact is relatively unknown. We assessed the effectiveness of Washington State's hub and spoke (WA-HS) model on 6-month outcomes of MOUD continuity and health care utilization. Methods: We analyzed 25 368 adult Medicaid beneficiaries with new MOUD episodes in 2016-2019, comparing HS and non-HS cohorts in the 6 months after starting MOUD. Results: Across both cohorts, 26% stayed on MOUD for 6 months, and within 6 months of MOUD initiation, 42% had an emergency department (ED) visit, 14% had any hospitalization, and 13% entered intensive substance use treatment. No significant differences were found between cohorts for all outcomes. Conclusion: Our null findings likely reflect the complexity of the OUD crisis, the many needs of people with OUD that require flexible approaches at the individual and systems levels, and the WA-HS focus on MOUD initiation. Findings highlight the need to ensure HS models incorporate strategies to address MOUD continuity to drive long-term recovery for people with OUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.