ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025
Affordability trade-offs following a public option: learning from the Colorado Option.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In 2023, Colorado implemented a public option, called the Colorado Option, and required all insurers in its Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace to offer plans following a uniform benefit design. While the Colorado Option aimed to lower the cost of Marketplace coverage, it is unclear whether the policy has had its intended effect. In this study, I examine how the affordability of Marketplace coverage changed after the Colorado Option for both subsidized and unsubsidized enrollees. Methods: This descriptive analysis used the HIX Compare Individual Market datasets from 2020 to 2025 to measure changes in benchmark Silver plan premiums and premium spreads (the difference in premium between the benchmark Silver plan and lowest-premium plan) in Colorado following the Colorado Option. Results: Between 2020 and 2025, benchmark Silver plan premiums in Colorado increased by $295.84 while premium spread increased by $79.53. These increases were greater than in comparison states. Conclusion: In the years following the Colorado Option, Marketplace coverage in Colorado became more affordable for subsidized enrollees but less affordable for unsubsidized ones. States considering public options should weigh this potential trade-off as they design and implement them to make sure the public option aligns with their policy goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.