Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896378›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

Medical debt and collections in the United States.

Scott L Fulford, Eric Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Scott L FulfordConsumer Financial Protection Bureau, Office of Research, Washington, DC 20552, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4881-7805
Eric WilsonConsumer Financial Protection Bureau, Office of Research, Washington, DC 20552, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1019-3510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Medical debt and collections are common and large, but estimates differ widely. Methods: We used 2 nationally representative surveys in 2024 that are associated with respondents' credit records to measure medical debt and medical collections from survey participants directly and compare their responses with the medical collections reported to the credit bureau. Results: In 2024, 36% of US households had medical debt, 21% had a past-due medical bill, and 23% were paying a medical bill over time to a provider. Medical and dental providers are thus one of the most common sources of credit to households. At the same time, 15% of people were contacted by someone other than their medical provider to collect a medical debt while only 12% had any medical collection on their credit record and 5% had a new collection. Active medical collections only partially overlap with medical collections on credit reports and neither represents all medical debt. We bound the mean total debt in active medical collection for people with such collections as between $2456 and $7931. Conclusion: These debts are not interchangeable, so future policy and research should distinguish carefully between them.

Indexed as

credit reportingdebt collectionmedical collectionsmedical debtmedical expenses

Identifiers

PMID40896378
PMCPMC12394938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.